it's like dawkins says when he's arguing with fundamentalists: science is about forming theories, and then proving them true or false. It's not about proving which scientist is right, or has the most followers. It's amazing to me that something so ubiquitous as natural selection could be suggested to be wrong in this day and age. this just proves to me that science is always trying to fact check, even if it proves a 150 year old hypothesis wrong (or at least misguided).
i'd been working on my daily piece at work all day, but then i left without moving the file over to my personal computer. so this is a quick replacement.